.png)
Finding common ground, forging resolutions
Our firm recognizes that traditional litigation may not always be the most efficient or cost-effective way to resolve disputes. ADR methods, such as mediation and arbitration, can often provide quicker and more flexible solutions while maintaining confidentiality and preserving relationships. Our experienced ADR practitioners work closely with clients to explore these options, guiding them through the process to achieve mutually beneficial outcomes. Whether it's resolving complex commercial disputes or family law matters, our ADR services are tailored to meet the unique needs of each client, providing efficient and effective solutions outside of the courtroom.
Tailored Solutions: Our arbitration and mediation services are tailored to meet the unique needs of each client and dispute, ensuring that the process is efficient and effective.
Cost-Effective: Arbitration and mediation can often be more cost-effective than traditional litigation, saving clients time and money.
Speedy Resolutions: These methods can lead to quicker resolutions compared to court proceedings, allowing parties to move forward with their lives or businesses sooner.
Key Services
Alternative Legal Services (ADR)
In our arbitration services, our experienced arbitrators facilitate fair and impartial hearings to resolve disputes efficiently and effectively. Arbitration offers a more streamlined and confidential process than traditional litigation, with outcomes that are often legally binding and enforceable. Our arbitrators bring a deep understanding of the law and industry-specific nuances to the table, ensuring that parties receive a resolution that is both just and practical.
In our mediation services, our skilled mediators act as neutral third parties to help disputing parties find common ground and reach mutually acceptable solutions. Mediation encourages open communication and collaboration, allowing parties to retain control over the outcome of their dispute. Our mediators are trained in conflict resolution techniques and work diligently to facilitate productive discussions, leading to resolutions that can preserve relationships and avoid the costs and uncertainties of litigation.
Attorneys in Charge
Justice Talwant Singh
Guide and Mentor
Justice Talwant Singh, a Senior Advocate and former Judge of the Delhi High Court has about four decades of judicial and legal experience. His illustrious career has been marked by unwavering dedication to justice, a profound understanding of the law, and a commitment to advocating for the rights of his clients. Widely recognized for his expertise in multiple legal domains, Justice Talwant Singh has become a respected figure in the legal community.
Harish Chandra Chawla
Senior Partner
Harish has over 32 years of experience in top management roles with the government and 19 years post-retirement as the Chairperson of the Consumer Forum, Govt. of Delhi, as well as a consultant with PSUs and the private sector. His expertise spans administration, engineering, legal affairs, procurement, construction, inspections, mediation, arbitration, recruitment, training, planning, development, and execution.
Ramakrishna Srinivasan
Senior Partner
Ramkrishna has been representing and advising clients in matters involving company litigations, consumer
litigations, arbitrations and legal notices before various courts in Bangalore and Delhi. He is Advocate on Record proactively managing corporate matters.
Amandeep Singh
Partner
Advocate Amandeep Singh is a dedicated lawyer known for his commitment to providing efficient and timely legal solutions to clients. With a practice spanning the High Court of Delhi, District Courts of Delhi, and other specialized tribunals, including The Debts Recovery Tribunal, MACT, and Consumer Forum, he has earned a reputation for his expertise in litigation and corporate law.
FAQ
What are the advantages of arbitration over litigation?
Some of the advantages of arbitration over litigation include:
Speed: Arbitration is often faster than litigation, with hearings scheduled at the convenience of the parties and the arbitrator(s).
Cost: Arbitration can be more cost-effective than litigation, as it generally involves fewer procedural steps and less discovery.
Privacy: Arbitration proceedings are private, unlike court proceedings, which are generally open to the public.
Flexibility: Parties have more flexibility in choosing the rules and procedures that will govern the arbitration process.
What is arbitration and how does it differ from litigation?
Arbitration is a form of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) where parties agree to have their dispute resolved by an arbitrator or panel of arbitrators, instead of going to court. Unlike litigation, which is conducted in a public court setting, arbitration is a private process where the parties have more control over the proceedings and the outcome.
What is mediation, and how does it differ from other forms of dispute resolution, such as arbitration or litigation?
Mediation is a form of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) in which a neutral third party, known as the mediator, facilitates communication and negotiation between parties to help them reach a mutually acceptable agreement. Unlike arbitration, where a third party makes a binding decision, or litigation, which involves a formal court process, mediation is non-binding and relies on the parties' voluntary agreement.
In mediation, the mediator does not impose a decision but instead helps the parties explore options and find common ground. The process is informal, flexible, and confidential, allowing parties to maintain more control over the outcome and often resulting in quicker and less costly resolutions compared to arbitration or litigation.
How does the choice of mediator impact the effectiveness of the mediation process, and what criteria should corporate entities consider when selecting a mediator?
The choice of mediator can significantly impact the effectiveness of the mediation process.
A skilled and experienced mediator can facilitate productive communication, foster cooperation between parties, and guide them toward a mutually acceptable resolution. When selecting a mediator, corporate entities should consider the following criteria:
Mediation Experience: Look for a mediator with extensive experience in corporate and commercial mediation, ideally with a background in the specific industry or type of dispute.
Neutrality and Impartiality: The mediator should be neutral and impartial, ensuring fairness and building trust with both parties.
Professionalism and Ethics: Ensure the mediator adheres to professional standards, including confidentiality and impartiality.
Resolving disputes efficiently and effectively through arbitration and mediation